We need to find which statement supports the passage's arguments. Let us trace the key ideas step by step. The passage's main argument: Technology isn't just tools -> it's an environment -> this environment shapes how we live. From passage: "critical theory of technology regards technologies as an environment rather than as a collection of tools. We live today with and even within technologies that determine our way of life." The passage then compares technology to laws and customs -> all three shape their inhabitants -> they represent different aspects of human nature. From passage: "As an environment, technologies shape their inhabitants. In this respect, they are comparable to laws and customs." So I'm looking for an option that matches this core idea: technology as environment that shapes society.

🟢 Option 1 -> correct -> directly captures the main argument that technologies form environmental context and shape human society (matches the passage's core thesis perfectly) 🔴 Option 2 -> reverses the meaning -> passage says the less romantic conception needs theoretical legitimacy, not the romantic one ("We can perhaps admit a less romantic conception...which...are also granted theoretical legitimacy") 🔴 Option 3 -> misattributes agency -> passage says nature IS what lies at the limit, not that nature DECIDES this limit ("nature is what lies at the limit of history") 🔴 Option 4 -> contradicts passage -> passage clearly states laws and customs represent dimensions of human nature, not human culture ("Laws of property represent the interest in ownership...Each of these institutions can be said to represent those who live under their sway") Option 1 perfectly restates the passage's central thesis about technology as environmental context that shapes society.

CAT (VARC) PYQs

Keyboard Shortcuts