Skip to main contentSkip to solution

Nature has all along yielded her flesh to humans. First, we took nature's materials as food, fibers, and shelter. Then we learned to extract raw materials from her biosphere to create our own new synthetic materials. Now Bios is yielding us her mind we are taking her logic.

Clockwork logicβ€”the logic of the machines will only build simple contraptions. Truly complex systems such as a cell, a meadow, an economy, or a brain (natural or artificial) require a rigorous nontechnological logic. We now see that no logic except bio-logic can assemble a thinking device, or even a workable system of any magnitude.

It is an astounding discovery that one can extract the logic of Bios out of biology and have something useful. Although many philosophers in the past have suspected one could abstract the laws of life and apply them elsewhere, it wasn't until the complexity of computers and human-made systems became as complicated as living things, that it was possible to prove this. It's eerie how much of life can be transferred. So far, some of the traits of the living that have successfully been transported to mechanical systems are: self-replication, self- governance, limited self-repair, mild evolution, and partial learning.

We have reason to believe yet more can be synthesized and made into something new. Yet at the same time that the logic of Bios is being imported into machines, the logic of Technos is being imported into life. The root of bioengineering is the desire to control the organic long enough to improve it. Domesticated plants and animals are examples of techno-logics applied to life. The wild aromatic root of the Queen Anne's lace weed has been fine-tuned over generations by selective herb gatherers until it has evolved into a sweet carrot of the garden; the udders of wild bovines have been selectively enlarged in a "unnatural" way to satisfy humans rather than calves. Milk cows and carrots, therefore, are human inventions as much as steam engines and gunpowder are. But milk cows and carrots are more indicative of the kind of inventions humans will make in the future: products that are grown rather than manufactured.

Genetic engineering is precisely what cattle breeders do when they select better strains of Holsteins, only bioengineers employ more precise and powerful control. While carrot and milk cow breeders had to rely on diffuse organic evolution, modern genetic engineers can use directed artificial evolution a purposeful design which greatly accelerates improvements.

The overlap of the mechanical and the lifelike increases year by year. Part of this bionic convergence is a matter of words. The meanings of "mechanical" and "life" are both stretching until all complicated things can be perceived as machines, and all self-sustaining machines can be perceived as alive. Yet beyond semantics, two concrete trends are happening:(1) Human-made things are behaving more lifelike, and (2) Life is becoming more engineered. The apparent veil between the organic and the manufactured has crumpled to reveal that the two really are, and have always been, of one being.

Which one of the following sets of words/phrases best serves as keywords to the passage?

Solution

βœ… Correct Option: 3

We need to find the set of words that best captures the main themes running through the entire passage.


Step-by-step thought process:

The passage talks about how nature first gave us materials, then we learned to extract her logic (bio-logic) -> This logic is now being put into machines -> Meanwhile, techno-logic is being applied to living things -> Examples like carrots and milk cows show this -> The result is convergence between mechanical and biological systems.

From passage: "The overlap of the mechanical and the lifelike increases year by year... The apparent veil between the organic and the manufactured has crumpled to reveal that the two really are, and have always been, of one being."

The passage is fundamentally about two-way exchange: bio-logic going into machines, techno-logic going into life, leading to convergence.


Option elimination analysis:

🟠 Option 1 -> partial-truth -> Has good examples (carrots, milk cows) and mentions nature/genetic engineering, but misses the core conceptual framework of bio-logic vs techno-logic that drives the whole argument

🟠 Option 2 -> partial-truth -> Captures convergence and techno-logic well, includes examples, but completely misses bio-logic which is central to the first half

🟒 Option 3 -> captures both scope and nuance accurately -> Has all the core concepts: complex systems (what requires bio-logic), bio-logic (nature's contribution), bioengineering/technos-logic (human contributions), convergence (the result)

πŸ”΄ Option 4 -> scope-error -> Too focused on minor details like self-repair and Holsteins rather than the big conceptual themes that structure the passage

Student confusion point: You might think Option 1 is good because it has concrete examples. But keywords should capture the organizing principles of the passage, not just memorable details.

The passage is structured around the interplay of bio-logic and techno-logic leading to convergence - Option 3 nails this framework.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question