Skip to main contentSkip to solution

The end of the age of the internal combustion engine is in sight. There are small signs everywhere: the shift to hybrid vehicles is already under way among manufacturers. Volvo has announced it will make no purely petrol-engined cars after 2019 and Tesla has just started selling its first electric car aimed squarely at the middle classes: the Tesla 33 sells for $35,000 in the US, and 400,000 people have put down a small, refundable deposit towards one. Several thousand have already taken delivery, and the company hopes to sell half a million more next year. This is a remarkable figure for a machine with a fairly short range and a very limited number of specialised charging stations.

Some of it reflects the remarkable abilities of Elon Musk, the company's founder, as a salesman, engineer, and a man able to get the most out his factory workers and the governments he deals with Mr. Musk is selling a dream that the world wants to believe in.

This last may be the most important factor in the story. The private car is...a device of immense practical help and economic significance, but at the same time a theatre for myths of unattainable self-fulfilment. The one thing you will never see in a car advertisement is traffic, even though that is the element in which drivers spend their lives. Every single driver in a traffic jam is trying to escape from it, yet it is the inevitable consequence of mass car ownership.

The sleek and swift electric car is at one level merely the most contemporary fantasy of autonomy and power. But it might also disrupt our exterior landscapes nearly as much as the fossil fuel-engined car did in the last century. Electrical cars would of course pollute far less than fossil fuel-driven ones; instead of oil reserves, the rarest materials for batteries would make undeserving despots and their dynasties fantastically rich. Petrol stations would disappear. The air in cities would once more be breathable and their streets as quiet as those of Venice. This isn't an unmixed good. Cars that were as silent as bicycles would still be as dangerous as they are now to anyone they hit without audible warning.

The dream goes further than that. The electric cars of the future will be so thoroughly equipped with sensors and reaction mechanisms that they will never hit anyone. Just as brakes don't let you skid today, the steering wheel of tomorrow will swerve you away from danger before you have even noticed it.

This is where the fantasy of autonomy comes full circle. The logical outcome of cars which need no driver is that they will become cars which need no owner either. Instead, they will work as taxis do, summoned at will but only for the journeys we actually need. This the future towards which Uber...is working. The ultimate development of the private car will be to reinvent public transport. Traffic jams will be abolished only when the private car becomes a public utility. What then will happen to our fantasies of independence? We'll all have to take to electrically powered bicycles.

Which of the following statements best reflects the author's argument?

Solution

āœ… Correct Option: 3

We need to find the main argument the author is making throughout the entire passage, not just supporting details.


Step 1: Find the author's key perspective

The passage starts with electric cars but quickly shifts to something deeper. Look for clues about the author's real focus:

From passage: "Mr. Musk is selling a dream that the world wants to believe in"

From passage: "The private car is...a theatre for myths of unattainable self-fulfilment"


Step 2: Follow the logic chain

Electric cars mentioned -> But author says it's about selling dreams -> Then explains cars are about myths -> Traffic jams show the myth is false -> Even future autonomous cars will end private ownership -> Back to public transport

Author's focus: The myth around cars, not the technology itself.


Step 3: Eliminate wrong options

🟠 Option 1 -> partial-truth -> Yes, passage mentions this fact but it's just the opening setup, not the main argument about what this trend really means

🟠 Option 2 -> scope-error -> True but too narrow - Musk being gifted is just one example of how the dream gets sold, not the core argument

šŸ”“ Option 4 -> irrelevant -> Minor detail comparison, completely misses the author's psychological focus on car ownership myths

🟢 Option 3 -> This captures the author's central thesis - that private cars represent false promises of freedom that can never be delivered (traffic jams prove this daily)

The author uses electric cars as a starting point to explore deeper truths about our relationship with private vehicles and the impossible dream of independence they represent.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question