Solution
We need to find what argument the passage makes using the dating evidence "725-780s."
From passage: "Most of the artifacts also date to the 780s, but some are as old as 725. That predates the beginning of Viking raids on Great Britain by about 70 years."
The passage uses this evidence to show a timeline comparison. Here's the thought process:
Artifacts found in marketplaces = 725-780s -> Viking raids began = 793 -> So trading came before raiding -> This proves Vikings were merchants before they became raiders
Students often get confused between Options 1, 2, and 4 because they all deal with dates. Here's how to think clearly:
🔴 Option 1 -> scope-error -> The passage never suggests changing the Viking Age start date. It uses 793 as a reference point to compare against, not to challenge it.
🔴 Option 2 -> contradicts-passage -> Says raids started in 725, but the passage clearly states raids began in 793. The 725 date is for trading artifacts, not raids.
🟠Option 3 -> context-shift -> This talks about where artifacts came from (which the passage already proved - Norway), but the dating evidence isn't used to argue about geographic origin. It's used to argue about timing.
🟢 Option 4 -> correct -> Captures exactly what the passage argues: the dating shows trade (725-780s) happened before raids (793), proving Vikings were traders first.
The key insight: The passage uses the 725-780 dates to establish a sequence - trading came first, then raiding.