Skip to main contentSkip to solution

Despite their fierce reputation. Vikings may not have always been the plunderers and pillagers popular culture imagines them to be. In fact, they got their start trading in northern European markets, researchers suggest.

Combs carved from animal antlers, as well as comb manufacturing waste and raw antler material has turned up at three archaeological sites in Denmark, including a medieval marketplace in the city of Ribe. A team of researchers from Denmark and the U.K. hoped to identify the species of animal to which the antlers once belonged by analyzing collagen proteins in the samples and comparing them across the animal kingdom, Laura Geggel reports for LiveScience. Somewhat surprisingly, molecular analysis of the artifacts revealed that some combs and other material had been carved from reindeer antlers. Given that reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) don't live in Denmark, the researchers posit that it arrived on Viking ships from Norway. Antler craftsmanship, in the form of decorative combs, was part of Viking culture. Such combs served as symbols of good health, Geggel writes. The fact that the animals shed their antlers also made them easy to collect from the large herds that inhabited Norway.

Since the artifacts were found in marketplace areas at each site it's more likely that the Norsemen came to trade rather than pillage. Most of the artifacts also date to the 780780 s, but some are as old as 725725. That predates the beginning of Viking raids on Great Britain by about 7070 years. (Traditionally, the so-called "Viking Age" began with these raids in 793793 and ended with the Norman conquest of Great Britain in 1066.) Archaeologists had suspected that the Vikings had experience with long maritime voyages [that] might have preceded their raiding days. Beyond Norway, these combs would have been a popular industry in Scandinavia as well. It's possible that the antler combs represent a larger trade network, where the Norsemen supplied raw material to craftsmen in Denmark and elsewhere.

The evidence - "Most of the artifacts also date to the 780s, but some are as old as 725" - has been used in the passage to argue that:

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 4

We need to find what argument the passage makes using the dating evidence "725-780s."

From passage: "Most of the artifacts also date to the 780s, but some are as old as 725. That predates the beginning of Viking raids on Great Britain by about 70 years."

The passage uses this evidence to show a timeline comparison. Here's the thought process:

Artifacts found in marketplaces = 725-780s -> Viking raids began = 793 -> So trading came before raiding -> This proves Vikings were merchants before they became raiders


Students often get confused between Options 1, 2, and 4 because they all deal with dates. Here's how to think clearly:

🔴 Option 1 -> scope-error -> The passage never suggests changing the Viking Age start date. It uses 793 as a reference point to compare against, not to challenge it.

🔴 Option 2 -> contradicts-passage -> Says raids started in 725, but the passage clearly states raids began in 793. The 725 date is for trading artifacts, not raids.

🟠 Option 3 -> context-shift -> This talks about where artifacts came from (which the passage already proved - Norway), but the dating evidence isn't used to argue about geographic origin. It's used to argue about timing.

🟢 Option 4 -> correct -> Captures exactly what the passage argues: the dating shows trade (725-780s) happened before raids (793), proving Vikings were traders first.

The key insight: The passage uses the 725-780 dates to establish a sequence - trading came first, then raiding.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question