Solution
Step-by-step approach:
Find direct support in passage for each option -> The one without support (or contradicted) = answer
The passage discusses Saturn's rings being young, made from destroyed moons, and mentions Enceladus as promising for life.
Option Analysis:
š¢ Option 1 -> supported -> rings from old moon remains
From passage: "They suggest that...an old set of moons orbiting Saturn destroyed themselves, and from their remains emerged not only the rings"
š¢ Option 2 -> supported -> lighter rings discolor faster
From passage: "The lighter the rings are, the faster this will happen, for the less mass they contain, the less celestial pollution they can absorb before they start to discolour"
š“ Option 3 -> contradicted by passage -> says NO moon had life conditions
From passage: "one of those moons, Enceladus, is widely considered the most promising site in the solar system on which to look for alien life"
This directly opposes option 3's claim that "none" had suitable conditions.
š¢ Option 4 -> supported -> Tethys and Dione younger than 100m years
From passage: "about 100m years ago...this interaction never happened-and thus...They must have come into being later"
Student confusion point: You might think "promising site to look for life" doesn't guarantee suitable conditions. But the question asks what we can "conclude" - and we definitely cannot conclude that NONE of Saturn's moons had suitable conditions when the passage specifically highlights one as very promising for life.
Answer: Option 3 - The passage contradicts this by presenting Enceladus as a promising site for life, making it impossible to conclude that none of Saturn's moons had suitable conditions.
More from this set:
Question 5