The sentences given below, when properly sequenced, would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the numbers as your answer.
- They would rather do virtuous side projects assiduously as long as these would not compel them into doing their day jobs more honourably or reduce the profit margins.
- They would fund a million of the buzzwordy programs rather than fundamentally question the rules of their game or alter their own behavior to reduce the harm of the existing distorted, inefficient and unfair rules.
- Like the dieter who would rather do anything to lose weight than actually eat less, the business elite would save the world through social-impact-investing and philanthrocapitalism.
- Doing the right thing and moving away from their win-win mentality - would involve real sacrifice; instead, it's easier to focus on their pet projects and initiatives.
The sentences given below, when properly sequenced, would yield a coherent paragraph. Decide on the proper sequencing of the order of the sentences and key in the sequence of the numbers as your answer.
- They would rather do virtuous side projects assiduously as long as these would not compel them into doing their day jobs more honourably or reduce the profit margins.
- They would fund a million of the buzzwordy programs rather than fundamentally question the rules of their game or alter their own behavior to reduce the harm of the existing distorted, inefficient and unfair rules.
- Like the dieter who would rather do anything to lose weight than actually eat less, the business elite would save the world through social-impact-investing and philanthrocapitalism.
- Doing the right thing and moving away from their win-win mentality - would involve real sacrifice; instead, it's easier to focus on their pet projects and initiatives.
Entered answer:
Solution
From passage: "Like the dieter who would rather do anything to lose weight than actually eat less, the business elite would save the world through social-impact-investing and philanthrocapitalism."
Step 1: Find the opening sentence -> Sentence 3 introduces both the analogy (dieter) and the main subject (business elite). No other sentence can start without context.
Step 2: Look for connecting words and ideas -> Sentence 2 picks up "social-impact-investing and philanthrocapitalism" from sentence 3 and expands on it with "buzzwordy programs."
Step 3: Find word connections -> Sentences 4 and 1 form a pair through "projects" (sentence 4 says "pet projects" -> sentence 1 says "side projects").
Step 4: Check logical flow -> 3 (introduction) -> 2 (elaboration) -> 4 (explains the real issue) -> 1 (continues the "projects" theme).
How to eliminate wrong options in para jumbles:
π΄ Any sequence not starting with 3 -> context-error -> No other sentence can stand alone as an opening. Sentences 1, 2, and 4 all use "they" without first introducing who "they" are.
π΄ Any sequence breaking 4-1 connection -> flow-error -> Sentence 4 mentions "pet projects" and sentence 1 continues with "side projects." They must be together in this order.
π΄ Any sequence not having 2 follow 3 -> idea-disconnect -> Sentence 2 directly elaborates on the concepts mentioned in sentence 3.
π’ 3241 is correct -> maintains natural flow from analogy -> elaboration -> explanation -> continuation.
Answer: 3241