The author uses "Which way is Oriental?" to challenge traditional power structures when everyone speaks the same language. From passage: "What exactly is the dynamic when a man from Missouri observes a Zhejiang native selling lingerie to an Upper Egyptian woman? If all of us now stand beside the same river, speaking in ways we all understand, who's looking east and who's looking west? Which way is Oriental?" The author is saying -> when people from different cultures can communicate -> old ideas about who has power don't work anymore -> language breaks down barriers. From passage: "And both the Chinese and the Egyptians welcomed me because I spoke their languages. My identity as a white male was far less important than my ability to communicate." This shows -> language skills matter more than race/gender -> communication removes hierarchies -> speaking someone's language changes relationships.

Elimination Strategy: Look for what the author specifically says breaks down barriers. Students often pick too broad or too narrow answers. 🔴 Option 1 -> too-narrow -> says "goodwill alone" but author focuses on language learning, not just being nice 🔴 Option 2 -> misses-the-point -> author isn't saying Orientalism disappeared, he's questioning it when everyone speaks the same language 🟠 Option 3 -> too-broad -> says "globalization" but author talks specifically about language, not general global changes 🟢 Option 4 -> correct -> matches author's main point that learning languages breaks down cultural power structures From passage: "After all, you can always learn another language and change who you are." The "Which way is Oriental?" question shows -> when everyone speaks each other's languages -> traditional ideas about cultural superiority don't make sense anymore.

CAT (VARC) PYQs

Keyboard Shortcuts