Five jumbled up sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), related to a topic, are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a coherent paragraph. Identify the odd sentence and key in the number of that sentence as your answer.
- Socrates told us that 'the unexamined life is not worth living' and that to 'know thyself' is the path to true wisdom
- It suggests that you should adopt an ancient rhetorical method favored by the likes of Julius Caesar and known as 'illeism' – or speaking about yourself in the third person.
- Research has shown that people who are prone to rumination also often suffer from impaired decision making under pressure and are at a substantially increased risk of depression.
- Simple rumination – the process of churning your concerns around in your head – is not the way to achieve self-realization.
- The idea is that this small change in perspective can clear your emotional fog, allowing you to see past your biases.
Five jumbled up sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), related to a topic, are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a coherent paragraph. Identify the odd sentence and key in the number of that sentence as your answer.
- Socrates told us that 'the unexamined life is not worth living' and that to 'know thyself' is the path to true wisdom
- It suggests that you should adopt an ancient rhetorical method favored by the likes of Julius Caesar and known as 'illeism' – or speaking about yourself in the third person.
- Research has shown that people who are prone to rumination also often suffer from impaired decision making under pressure and are at a substantially increased risk of depression.
- Simple rumination – the process of churning your concerns around in your head – is not the way to achieve self-realization.
- The idea is that this small change in perspective can clear your emotional fog, allowing you to see past your biases.
Entered answer:
Solution
From passage: "Simple rumination – the process of churning your concerns around in your head – is not the way to achieve self-realization."
Let us trace the logical flow step by step:
Step 1: Find the main topic -> The passage is about methods of self-realization
Step 2: Look for connecting words -> "It" in sentence 2, "this small change" in sentence 5
Step 3: Build connections:
- Sentence 4 says rumination is not the way to achieve self-realization
- Sentence 3 gives research proof why rumination is bad (depression, poor decisions)
- Sentence 2 says "It suggests" an alternative method called illeism (the "It" refers to the research in sentence 3)
- Sentence 5 explains benefits of "this small change" (referring to illeism from sentence 2)
Logical flow: 4 → 3 → 2 → 5 (rumination is bad → research proves it → research suggests illeism instead → illeism has benefits)
The odd one out:
🔴 Sentence 1 -> context-shift -> talks about Socrates and general wisdom, but the other four sentences discuss specific methods (rumination vs illeism) for self-realization. While sentence 1 is about self-knowledge, it doesn't connect to the rumination-illeism comparison that forms the core argument.
The four sentences that work together (4-3-2-5) create a clear argument: rumination is bad → here's proof → try illeism instead → here's why illeism works.
Sentence 1 stands alone as a philosophical quote that doesn't fit this specific methodological discussion.
Answer: 1