CAT 2024 PYQsData Interpretation & Logical Reasoning. Free, no login required.

The game of QUIET is played between two teams. Six teams, numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, play in a QUIET tournament. These teams are divided equally into two groups. In the tournament, each team plays every other team in the same group only once, and each team in the other group exactly twice. The tournament has several rounds, each of which consists of a few games. Every team plays exactly one game in each round.

The following additional facts are known about the schedule of games in the tournament.

1. Each team played against a team from the other group in Round 8.

2. In Round 4 and Round 7, the match-ups, that is the pair of teams playing against each other, were identical. In Round 5 and Round 8, the match-ups were identical.

3. Team 4 played Team 6 in both Round 1 and Round 2.

4. Team 1 played Team 5 ONLY once and that was in Round 2.

5. Team 3 played Team 4 in Round 3. Team 1 played Team 6 in Round 6.

6. In Round 8, Team 3 played Team 6, while Team 2 played Team 5.

The game of QUIET is played between two teams. Six teams, numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, play in a QUIET tournament. These teams are divided equally into two groups. In the tournament, each team plays every other team in the same group only once, and each team in the other group exactly twice. The tournament has several rounds, each of which consists of a few games. Every team plays exactly one game in each round.

The following additional facts are known about the schedule of games in the tournament.

1. Each team played against a team from the other group in Round 8.

2. In Round 4 and Round 7, the match-ups, that is the pair of teams playing against each other, were identical. In Round 5 and Round 8, the match-ups were identical.

3. Team 4 played Team 6 in both Round 1 and Round 2.

4. Team 1 played Team 5 ONLY once and that was in Round 2.

5. Team 3 played Team 4 in Round 3. Team 1 played Team 6 in Round 6.

6. In Round 8, Team 3 played Team 6, while Team 2 played Team 5.

The game of QUIET is played between two teams. Six teams, numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, play in a QUIET tournament. These teams are divided equally into two groups. In the tournament, each team plays every other team in the same group only once, and each team in the other group exactly twice. The tournament has several rounds, each of which consists of a few games. Every team plays exactly one game in each round.

The following additional facts are known about the schedule of games in the tournament.

1. Each team played against a team from the other group in Round 8.

2. In Round 4 and Round 7, the match-ups, that is the pair of teams playing against each other, were identical. In Round 5 and Round 8, the match-ups were identical.

3. Team 4 played Team 6 in both Round 1 and Round 2.

4. Team 1 played Team 5 ONLY once and that was in Round 2.

5. Team 3 played Team 4 in Round 3. Team 1 played Team 6 in Round 6.

6. In Round 8, Team 3 played Team 6, while Team 2 played Team 5.

The game of QUIET is played between two teams. Six teams, numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, play in a QUIET tournament. These teams are divided equally into two groups. In the tournament, each team plays every other team in the same group only once, and each team in the other group exactly twice. The tournament has several rounds, each of which consists of a few games. Every team plays exactly one game in each round.

The following additional facts are known about the schedule of games in the tournament.

1. Each team played against a team from the other group in Round 8.

2. In Round 4 and Round 7, the match-ups, that is the pair of teams playing against each other, were identical. In Round 5 and Round 8, the match-ups were identical.

3. Team 4 played Team 6 in both Round 1 and Round 2.

4. Team 1 played Team 5 ONLY once and that was in Round 2.

5. Team 3 played Team 4 in Round 3. Team 1 played Team 6 in Round 6.

6. In Round 8, Team 3 played Team 6, while Team 2 played Team 5.

The game of QUIET is played between two teams. Six teams, numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, play in a QUIET tournament. These teams are divided equally into two groups. In the tournament, each team plays every other team in the same group only once, and each team in the other group exactly twice. The tournament has several rounds, each of which consists of a few games. Every team plays exactly one game in each round.

The following additional facts are known about the schedule of games in the tournament.

1. Each team played against a team from the other group in Round 8.

2. In Round 4 and Round 7, the match-ups, that is the pair of teams playing against each other, were identical. In Round 5 and Round 8, the match-ups were identical.

3. Team 4 played Team 6 in both Round 1 and Round 2.

4. Team 1 played Team 5 ONLY once and that was in Round 2.

5. Team 3 played Team 4 in Round 3. Team 1 played Team 6 in Round 6.

6. In Round 8, Team 3 played Team 6, while Team 2 played Team 5.

The chart below provides complete information about the number of countries visited by Dheeraj, Samantha and Nitesh, in Asia, Europe and the rest of the world (ROW).

The following additional facts are known about the countries visited by them.

1. 32 countries were visited by at least one of them.
2. USA (in ROW) is the only country that was visited by all three of them.
3. China (in Asia) is the only country that was visited by both Dheeraj and Nitesh, but not by Samantha.
4. France (in Europe) is the only country outside Asia, which was visited by both Dheeraj and Samantha, but not by Nitesh.
5. Half of the countries visited by both Samantha and Nitesh are in Europe.

The chart below provides complete information about the number of countries visited by Dheeraj, Samantha and Nitesh, in Asia, Europe and the rest of the world (ROW).

The following additional facts are known about the countries visited by them.

1. 32 countries were visited by at least one of them.
2. USA (in ROW) is the only country that was visited by all three of them.
3. China (in Asia) is the only country that was visited by both Dheeraj and Nitesh, but not by Samantha.
4. France (in Europe) is the only country outside Asia, which was visited by both Dheeraj and Samantha, but not by Nitesh.
5. Half of the countries visited by both Samantha and Nitesh are in Europe.

The chart below provides complete information about the number of countries visited by Dheeraj, Samantha and Nitesh, in Asia, Europe and the rest of the world (ROW).

The following additional facts are known about the countries visited by them.

1. 32 countries were visited by at least one of them.
2. USA (in ROW) is the only country that was visited by all three of them.
3. China (in Asia) is the only country that was visited by both Dheeraj and Nitesh, but not by Samantha.
4. France (in Europe) is the only country outside Asia, which was visited by both Dheeraj and Samantha, but not by Nitesh.
5. Half of the countries visited by both Samantha and Nitesh are in Europe.

The chart below provides complete information about the number of countries visited by Dheeraj, Samantha and Nitesh, in Asia, Europe and the rest of the world (ROW).

The following additional facts are known about the countries visited by them.

1. 32 countries were visited by at least one of them.
2. USA (in ROW) is the only country that was visited by all three of them.
3. China (in Asia) is the only country that was visited by both Dheeraj and Nitesh, but not by Samantha.
4. France (in Europe) is the only country outside Asia, which was visited by both Dheeraj and Samantha, but not by Nitesh.
5. Half of the countries visited by both Samantha and Nitesh are in Europe.

The chart below shows the price data for seven shares- A,B,C,D,E,F, and G as a candlestick plot for a particular day. The vertical axis shows the price of the share in rupees. A share whose closing price (price at the end of the day) is more than its opening price (price at the start of the day) is called a bullish share; otherwise, it is called a bearish share. All bullish and bearish shares are shown in green and red colour respectively.

The chart below shows the price data for seven shares- A,B,C,D,E,F, and G as a candlestick plot for a particular day. The vertical axis shows the price of the share in rupees. A share whose closing price (price at the end of the day) is more than its opening price (price at the start of the day) is called a bullish share; otherwise, it is called a bearish share. All bullish and bearish shares are shown in green and red colour respectively.

The chart below shows the price data for seven shares- A,B,C,D,E,F, and G as a candlestick plot for a particular day. The vertical axis shows the price of the share in rupees. A share whose closing price (price at the end of the day) is more than its opening price (price at the start of the day) is called a bullish share; otherwise, it is called a bearish share. All bullish and bearish shares are shown in green and red colour respectively.

The chart below shows the price data for seven shares- A,B,C,D,E,F, and G as a candlestick plot for a particular day. The vertical axis shows the price of the share in rupees. A share whose closing price (price at the end of the day) is more than its opening price (price at the start of the day) is called a bullish share; otherwise, it is called a bearish share. All bullish and bearish shares are shown in green and red colour respectively.

Six web surfers M, N, O, P, X, and Y each had 30 stars which they distributed among four bloggers A, B, C, and D. The number of stars received by A and B from the six web surfers is shown in the figure below.

The following additional facts are known regarding the number of stars received by the bloggers from the surfers.

1. The numbers of stars received by the bloggers from the surfers were all multiples of 5 (including 0).

2. The total numbers of stars received by the bloggers were the same.

3. Each blogger received a different number of stars from M.

4. Two surfers gave all their stars to a single blogger. 5. D received more stars than C from Y.

Six web surfers M, N, O, P, X, and Y each had 30 stars which they distributed among four bloggers A, B, C, and D. The number of stars received by A and B from the six web surfers is shown in the figure below.

The following additional facts are known regarding the number of stars received by the bloggers from the surfers.

1. The numbers of stars received by the bloggers from the surfers were all multiples of 5 (including 0).

2. The total numbers of stars received by the bloggers were the same.

3. Each blogger received a different number of stars from M.

4. Two surfers gave all their stars to a single blogger. 5. D received more stars than C from Y.

Six web surfers M, N, O, P, X, and Y each had 30 stars which they distributed among four bloggers A, B, C, and D. The number of stars received by A and B from the six web surfers is shown in the figure below.

The following additional facts are known regarding the number of stars received by the bloggers from the surfers.

1. The numbers of stars received by the bloggers from the surfers were all multiples of 5 (including 0).

2. The total numbers of stars received by the bloggers were the same.

3. Each blogger received a different number of stars from M.

4. Two surfers gave all their stars to a single blogger. 5. D received more stars than C from Y.

Six web surfers M, N, O, P, X, and Y each had 30 stars which they distributed among four bloggers A, B, C, and D. The number of stars received by A and B from the six web surfers is shown in the figure below.

The following additional facts are known regarding the number of stars received by the bloggers from the surfers.

1. The numbers of stars received by the bloggers from the surfers were all multiples of 5 (including 0).

2. The total numbers of stars received by the bloggers were the same.

3. Each blogger received a different number of stars from M.

4. Two surfers gave all their stars to a single blogger. 5. D received more stars than C from Y.

Two students, Amiya and Ramya are the only candidates in an election for the position of class representative. Students will vote based on the intensity level of Amiya's and Ramya's campaigns and the type of campaigns they run. Each campaign is said to have a level of $1$ if it is a staid campaign and a level of $2$ if it is a vigorous campaign. Campaigns can be of two types, they can either focus on issues, or on attacking the other candidate.

If Amiya and Ramya both run campaigns focusing on issues, then

• The percentage of students voting in the election will be $20$ times the sum of the levels of campaigning of the two students. For example, if Amiya and Ramya both run vigorous campaigns, then $20 \times(2+2) \%$, that is, $80 \%$ of the students will vote in the election.

• Among voting students, the percentage of votes for each candidate will be proportional to the levels of their campaigns. For example, if Amiya runs a staid (i.e., level 1) campaign while Ramya runs a vigorous (i.e., level 2) campaign, then Amiya will receive $1 / 3$ of the votes cast, and Ramya will receive the other $2 / 3$.

The above-mentioned percentages change as follows if at least one of them runs a campaign attacking their opponent.

• If Amiya runs a campaign attacking Ramya and Ramya runs a campaign focusing on issues, then $10 \%$ of the students who would have otherwise voted for Amiya will vote for Ramya, and another $10 \%$ who would have otherwise voted for Amiya, will not vote at all.

• If Ramya runs a campaign attacking Amiya and Amiya runs a campaign focusing on issues, then $20 \%$ of the students who would have otherwise voted for Ramya will vote for Amiya, and another $5 \%$ who would have otherwise voted for Ramya, will not vote at all.

• If both run campaigns attacking each other, then $10 \%$ of the students who would have otherwise voted for them had they run campaigns focusing on issues, will not vote at all.

Two students, Amiya and Ramya are the only candidates in an election for the position of class representative. Students will vote based on the intensity level of Amiya's and Ramya's campaigns and the type of campaigns they run. Each campaign is said to have a level of $1$ if it is a staid campaign and a level of $2$ if it is a vigorous campaign. Campaigns can be of two types, they can either focus on issues, or on attacking the other candidate.

If Amiya and Ramya both run campaigns focusing on issues, then

• The percentage of students voting in the election will be $20$ times the sum of the levels of campaigning of the two students. For example, if Amiya and Ramya both run vigorous campaigns, then $20 \times(2+2) \%$, that is, $80 \%$ of the students will vote in the election.

• Among voting students, the percentage of votes for each candidate will be proportional to the levels of their campaigns. For example, if Amiya runs a staid (i.e., level 1) campaign while Ramya runs a vigorous (i.e., level 2) campaign, then Amiya will receive $1 / 3$ of the votes cast, and Ramya will receive the other $2 / 3$.

The above-mentioned percentages change as follows if at least one of them runs a campaign attacking their opponent.

• If Amiya runs a campaign attacking Ramya and Ramya runs a campaign focusing on issues, then $10 \%$ of the students who would have otherwise voted for Amiya will vote for Ramya, and another $10 \%$ who would have otherwise voted for Amiya, will not vote at all.

• If Ramya runs a campaign attacking Amiya and Amiya runs a campaign focusing on issues, then $20 \%$ of the students who would have otherwise voted for Ramya will vote for Amiya, and another $5 \%$ who would have otherwise voted for Ramya, will not vote at all.

• If both run campaigns attacking each other, then $10 \%$ of the students who would have otherwise voted for them had they run campaigns focusing on issues, will not vote at all.

Two students, Amiya and Ramya are the only candidates in an election for the position of class representative. Students will vote based on the intensity level of Amiya's and Ramya's campaigns and the type of campaigns they run. Each campaign is said to have a level of $1$ if it is a staid campaign and a level of $2$ if it is a vigorous campaign. Campaigns can be of two types, they can either focus on issues, or on attacking the other candidate.

If Amiya and Ramya both run campaigns focusing on issues, then

• The percentage of students voting in the election will be $20$ times the sum of the levels of campaigning of the two students. For example, if Amiya and Ramya both run vigorous campaigns, then $20 \times(2+2) \%$, that is, $80 \%$ of the students will vote in the election.

• Among voting students, the percentage of votes for each candidate will be proportional to the levels of their campaigns. For example, if Amiya runs a staid (i.e., level 1) campaign while Ramya runs a vigorous (i.e., level 2) campaign, then Amiya will receive $1 / 3$ of the votes cast, and Ramya will receive the other $2 / 3$.

The above-mentioned percentages change as follows if at least one of them runs a campaign attacking their opponent.

• If Amiya runs a campaign attacking Ramya and Ramya runs a campaign focusing on issues, then $10 \%$ of the students who would have otherwise voted for Amiya will vote for Ramya, and another $10 \%$ who would have otherwise voted for Amiya, will not vote at all.

• If Ramya runs a campaign attacking Amiya and Amiya runs a campaign focusing on issues, then $20 \%$ of the students who would have otherwise voted for Ramya will vote for Amiya, and another $5 \%$ who would have otherwise voted for Ramya, will not vote at all.

• If both run campaigns attacking each other, then $10 \%$ of the students who would have otherwise voted for them had they run campaigns focusing on issues, will not vote at all.

Two students, Amiya and Ramya are the only candidates in an election for the position of class representative. Students will vote based on the intensity level of Amiya's and Ramya's campaigns and the type of campaigns they run. Each campaign is said to have a level of $1$ if it is a staid campaign and a level of $2$ if it is a vigorous campaign. Campaigns can be of two types, they can either focus on issues, or on attacking the other candidate.

If Amiya and Ramya both run campaigns focusing on issues, then

• The percentage of students voting in the election will be $20$ times the sum of the levels of campaigning of the two students. For example, if Amiya and Ramya both run vigorous campaigns, then $20 \times(2+2) \%$, that is, $80 \%$ of the students will vote in the election.

• Among voting students, the percentage of votes for each candidate will be proportional to the levels of their campaigns. For example, if Amiya runs a staid (i.e., level 1) campaign while Ramya runs a vigorous (i.e., level 2) campaign, then Amiya will receive $1 / 3$ of the votes cast, and Ramya will receive the other $2 / 3$.

The above-mentioned percentages change as follows if at least one of them runs a campaign attacking their opponent.

• If Amiya runs a campaign attacking Ramya and Ramya runs a campaign focusing on issues, then $10 \%$ of the students who would have otherwise voted for Amiya will vote for Ramya, and another $10 \%$ who would have otherwise voted for Amiya, will not vote at all.

• If Ramya runs a campaign attacking Amiya and Amiya runs a campaign focusing on issues, then $20 \%$ of the students who would have otherwise voted for Ramya will vote for Amiya, and another $5 \%$ who would have otherwise voted for Ramya, will not vote at all.

• If both run campaigns attacking each other, then $10 \%$ of the students who would have otherwise voted for them had they run campaigns focusing on issues, will not vote at all.

Two students, Amiya and Ramya are the only candidates in an election for the position of class representative. Students will vote based on the intensity level of Amiya's and Ramya's campaigns and the type of campaigns they run. Each campaign is said to have a level of $1$ if it is a staid campaign and a level of $2$ if it is a vigorous campaign. Campaigns can be of two types, they can either focus on issues, or on attacking the other candidate.

If Amiya and Ramya both run campaigns focusing on issues, then

• The percentage of students voting in the election will be $20$ times the sum of the levels of campaigning of the two students. For example, if Amiya and Ramya both run vigorous campaigns, then $20 \times(2+2) \%$, that is, $80 \%$ of the students will vote in the election.

• Among voting students, the percentage of votes for each candidate will be proportional to the levels of their campaigns. For example, if Amiya runs a staid (i.e., level 1) campaign while Ramya runs a vigorous (i.e., level 2) campaign, then Amiya will receive $1 / 3$ of the votes cast, and Ramya will receive the other $2 / 3$.

The above-mentioned percentages change as follows if at least one of them runs a campaign attacking their opponent.

• If Amiya runs a campaign attacking Ramya and Ramya runs a campaign focusing on issues, then $10 \%$ of the students who would have otherwise voted for Amiya will vote for Ramya, and another $10 \%$ who would have otherwise voted for Amiya, will not vote at all.

• If Ramya runs a campaign attacking Amiya and Amiya runs a campaign focusing on issues, then $20 \%$ of the students who would have otherwise voted for Ramya will vote for Amiya, and another $5 \%$ who would have otherwise voted for Ramya, will not vote at all.

• If both run campaigns attacking each other, then $10 \%$ of the students who would have otherwise voted for them had they run campaigns focusing on issues, will not vote at all.