Solution
From passage: "Nouns and verbs are the two indispensable parts of writing. Without one of each, no group of words can be a sentence"
From passage: "Take any noun, put it with any verb, and you have a sentence. It never fails."
The passage strongly argues that nouns and verbs are essential for sentences -> So if someone said "complete sentences don't need nouns and verbs" and that turned out to be false, it would actually support what the author is saying.
Think of it this way: If your friend disagrees with you, but then their disagreement proves to be wrong, that actually supports your original point!
π Option 1 -> actually-supports-passage -> The passage directly says understanding grammar helps you know if you're writing well. If this were false, it would contradict the passage, not support it.
π΄ Option 2 -> irrelevant -> The passage never mentions women writers specifically. Whether this is true or false doesn't relate to the author's arguments about grammar and sentence structure.
π Option 3 -> stated-as-true -> The passage explicitly says "the best writers sometimes disregard the rules of rhetoric." Since this matches what's in the passage, making it false would contradict the author.
π’ Option 4 -> opposite-of-passage -> This statement goes directly against the passage's main argument that nouns and verbs are "indispensable." If this statement were false (meaning sentences DO need nouns and verbs), it would perfectly support the author's central point about sentence construction.