Solution
From passage: "It seems to me that there is a much bigger gap between the world of finance and that of the general public and that there is a need to narrow that gap, if the financial industry is not to be a kind of priesthood, administering to its own mysteries and feared and resented by the rest of us."
Author's concern -> finance world is like a priesthood (exclusive club) -> general public doesn't understand basic economics -> this gap needs to be narrowed
From passage: "Many bright, literate people have no idea about all sorts of economic basics, of a type that financial insiders take as elementary facts of how the world works."
Author's solution -> educate the masses about finance basics -> make finance knowledge accessible to everyone -> bridge the gap
š“ Option 1 -> scope-error -> focuses on creating researchers, not educating masses. Author wants to teach general public, not create more experts.
š“ Option 2 -> irrelevant -> about policy-making, not education. Author's concern is knowledge gap, not market policies.
š¢ Option 3 -> correct -> perfectly matches author's goal. "Financial literacy in masses" = narrowing the gap between finance world and general public.
š“ Option 4 -> extreme/irrelevant -> nationalizing banks isn't mentioned anywhere. Author talks about education, not changing ownership.
Key insight: Author sees the problem as ignorance, not bad institutions. His solution is education, not restructuring.
More from this set:
Question 14