Skip to main contentSkip to solution

Cuttlefish are full of personality, as behavioral ecologist Alexandra Schnell found out while researching the cephalopod's potential to display self-control. "Self-control is thought to be the cornerstone of intelligence, as it is an important prerequisite for complex decision-making and planning for the future," says Schnell.

Schnell's study used a modified version of the "marshmallow test". During the original marshmallow test, psychologist Walter Mischel presented children between age four and six with one marshmallow. He told them that if they waited 15 minutes and didn't eat it, he would give them a second marshmallo. A long-term follow-up study showed that the children who waited for the second marshmallow had more success later in life. The cuttlefish version of the experiment looked a lot different. The researchers worked with six cuttlefish under nine months old and presented them with seafood instead of sweets. Preliminary experiments showed that cuttlefishes' favorite food is live grass shrimp, while raw prawns are so-so and Asian shore crab is nearly unacceptable. Since the researchers couldn't explain to the cuttlefish that they would need to wait for their shrimp, they trained them to recognize certain shapes that indicated when a food item would become available. The symbols were pasted on transparent drawers so that the cuttlefish could see the food that was stored inside. One drawer, labeled with a circle to mean "immediate,” held raw king prawn. Another drawer, labeled with a triangle to mean "delayed,” held live grass shrimp. During a control experiment, square labels meant "never."

"If their self-control is flexible and I hadn't just trained them to wait in any context, you would expect the cuttlefish to take the immediate reward, even if it's their second preference," says Schnell. And that's what they did. That showed the researchers that cuttlefish wouldn't reject the prawns if it was the only food available. In the experimental trials, the cuttlefish didn't jump on the prawns if the live grass shrimp were labeled with a triangle many waited for the shrimp drawer to open up. Each time the cuttlefish showed it could wait, the researchers tacked another ten seconds on to the next round of waiting before releasing the shrimp. The longest that a cuttlefish waited was 130 seconds.

Schnell says that the cuttlefish usually sat at the bottom of the tank and looked at the two food items while they waited, but sometimes, they would turn away from the king prawn "as if to distract themselves from the temptation of the immediate reward." In past studies, humans, chimpanzees, parrots and dogs also tried to distract themselves while waiting for a reward.

Not every species can use self-control, but most of the animals that can share another trait in common: long, social lives. Cuttlefish, on the other hand, are solitary creatures that don't form relationships even with mates or young. "We don't know if living in a social group is important for complex cognition unless we also show those abilities are lacking in less social species," says comparative psychologist Jennifer Vonk.

All of the following constitute a point of difference between the "original" and "modified" versions of the marshmallow test EXCEPT that:

Solution

βœ… Correct Option: 4

From passage: "That showed the researchers that cuttlefish wouldn't reject the prawns if it was the only food available."

The key insight -> this line shows the study wasn't about survival at all. The researchers were just checking if cuttlefish had flexible self-control, not studying survival benefits.

Let us trace through what the passage actually says about differences:

Original test -> children, 15 minutes, verbal instructions, tracked future success

Modified test -> cuttlefish, max 130 seconds, symbol training, studied self-control flexibility


Elimination process:

🟒 Option 1 -> clearly true difference -> 15 minutes vs max 130 seconds (about 2 minutes)

🟒 Option 2 -> obviously true difference -> children vs cuttlefish explicitly stated

🟒 Option 3 -> clearly true difference -> "told them" vs "trained them to recognize shapes"

πŸ”΄ Option 4 -> false claim -> passage never says modified test studied "survival advantages." The cuttlefish study only looked at whether they could show flexible self-control, not whether this helped them survive

The confusion students have -> they might think since the study used food, it must be about survival. But the passage shows researchers were testing cognitive flexibility, not survival benefits.

Option 4 is correct because it makes up a connection that doesn't exist in the passage.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question