Solution
We need to find what cannot be inferred from the experiment.
Step-by-step thought process:
The experiment tested if cuttlefish have self-control -> They used a modified marshmallow test -> Cuttlefish waited up to 130 seconds for better food -> This shows they can delay gratification
From passage: "We don't know if living in a social group is important for complex cognition unless we also show those abilities are lacking in less social species"
Key insight -> Cuttlefish are solitary but still showed intelligence/self-control -> This actually suggests intelligence is possible without being social.
Option Analysis:
π’ Option 1 -> Can be inferred -> Passage says cuttlefish "would turn away from the king prawn as if to distract themselves" - clear evidence of using diversions
π’ Option 2 -> Can be inferred -> Passage shows they prefer "live grass shrimp" over "raw prawns" and waited for their favorite - clear food choices
π΄ Option 3 -> Cannot be inferred -> This is backwards! The experiment shows cuttlefish (who are NOT social) still have intelligence. The researcher even says "we don't know if social groups are needed for intelligence." The evidence actually suggests intelligence can exist without sociability.
π’ Option 4 -> Can be inferred -> The whole experiment was based on testing self-control like in human children, and cuttlefish succeeded by waiting up to 130 seconds
Student confusion: You might think Option 3 sounds logical since many smart animals are social. But the passage specifically shows cuttlefish break this pattern - they're smart but not social.
More from this set:
Question 2