Solution
Understanding the passage's main claim: The author contrasts mainstream English fiction with Indian Ocean novels. Mainstream fiction is described as Europe/US-centered, assuming "Christianity and whiteness," mentioning places like "Paris and New York." Indian Ocean novels offer a different perspective - featuring "largely Islamic space" and "characters of colour."
From passage: "Those commonly found ones are mostly centred in Europe or the US, assume a background of Christianity and whiteness, and mention places like Paris and New York. The novels in my book highlight instead a largely Islamic space, feature characters of colour..."
The key insight -> We need the statement that supports rather than weakens this contrast.
π Option 1 -> weakens the claim -> Says Indian Ocean novels show "postcolonial nostalgia for an idyllic past" which contradicts the passage's point that "Indian Ocean Africa is not romanticised"
π Option 2 -> weakens the claim -> Says Indian Ocean novels use "Orientalist imagination" which would make them similar to problematic mainstream fiction, not different
π’ Option 3 -> supports the claim -> Says mainstream fiction "privileged the Christian, white, male experience" which perfectly matches the passage's description of mainstream fiction as assuming "Christianity and whiteness"
π Option 4 -> weakens the claim -> Says "very few" mainstream novels are set in American/European centers, but the passage claims they mention "places like Paris and New York"
Option 3 actually reinforces the passage's characterization of mainstream English fiction instead of challenging it. It's the exception that supports rather than weakens.
More from this set:
Question 10
Question 11