Skip to main contentSkip to solution

Once a society accepts a secular mode of creativity, within which the creator replaces God, imaginative transactions assume a self-conscious form. The tribal imagination, on the other hand, is still to a large extent dreamlike and hallucinatory. It admits fusion between various planes of existence and levels of time in a natural and artless manner. In tribal stories, oceans fly in the sky as birds, mountains swim in water as fish, animals speak as humans and stars grow like plants. Spatial order and temporal sequence do not restrict the narrative. This is not to say that tribal creations have no conventions or rules, but simply that they admit the principle of association between emotion and the narrative motif. Thus stars, seas, mountains, trees, men and animals can be angry, sad or happy.

It might be said that tribal artists work more on the basis of their racial and sensory memory than on the basis of a cultivated imagination. In order to understand this distinction, we must understand the difference between imagination and memory. In the animate world, consciousness meets two immediate material realities: space and time. We put meaning into space by perceiving it in terms of images. The image-making faculty is a genetic gift to the human mind—this power of imagination helps us understand the space that envelops us. With regard to time, we make connections with the help of memory; one remembers being the same person today as one was yesterday.

The tribal mind has a more acute sense of time than the sense of space. Somewhere along the history of human civilization, tribal communities seem to have realized that domination over territorial space was not their lot. Thus, they seem to have turned almost obsessively to gaining domination over time. This urge is substantiated in their ritual of conversing with their dead ancestors: year after year, tribals in many parts of India worship terracotta or carved-wood objects representing their ancestors, aspiring to enter a trance in which they can converse with the dead. Over the centuries, an amazingly sharp memory has helped tribals classify material and natural objects into a highly complex system of knowledge. . . .

One of the main characteristics of the tribal arts is their distinct manner of constructing space and imagery, which might be described as ‘hallucinatory’. In both oral and visual forms of representation, tribal artists seem to interpret verbal or pictorial space as demarcated by an extremely flexible ‘frame’. The boundaries between art and non-art become almost invisible. A tribal epic can begin its narration from a trivial everyday event; tribal paintings merge with living space as if the two were one and the same. And within the narrative itself, or within the painted imagery, there is no deliberate attempt to follow a sequence. The episodes retold and the images created take on the apparently chaotic shapes of dreams. In a way, the syntax of language and the grammar of painting are the same, as if literature were painted words and painting were a song of images.

All of the following, if true, would weaken the passage’s claims about the hallucinatory tribal imagination EXCEPT that:

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 3

The correct answer is option 3. This is an EXCEPT question, so the correct choice is the one that does NOT weaken the passage's claims about hallucinatory tribal imagination. Option 3 states that shamanic rituals involving conversing with the dead often feature in tribal stories. Paragraph 3 explicitly describes how tribals worship terracotta or carved-wood objects representing ancestors and aspire to enter trances to converse with the dead. This detail is entirely consistent with the passage's portrayal of the tribal imagination as hallucinatory and dreamlike, so it would reinforce, not weaken, the passage's claims.

Option 1 is wrong as a choice for EXCEPT (it would weaken the passage). The final paragraph states that tribal epics can begin from trivial everyday events and that paintings merge with living space. Excluding mundane reality from tribal art would directly contradict this claim, thereby weakening the argument.

Option 2 is wrong as a choice for EXCEPT (it would weaken the passage). Paragraph 1 describes tribal stories in which oceans fly as birds and mountains swim as fish. If tribal stories instead depicted nature in accordance with rational scientific knowledge, this fantastical, hallucinatory quality would be undermined.

Option 4 is wrong as a choice for EXCEPT (it would weaken the passage). The final paragraph emphasizes that tribal narratives make no deliberate attempt to follow a sequence and take on the chaotic shapes of dreams. A chronological beginning, middle, and end would directly contradict this non-sequential, hallucinatory character.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question