Skip to main contentSkip to solution

Once a society accepts a secular mode of creativity, within which the creator replaces God, imaginative transactions assume a self-conscious form. The tribal imagination, on the other hand, is still to a large extent dreamlike and hallucinatory. It admits fusion between various planes of existence and levels of time in a natural and artless manner. In tribal stories, oceans fly in the sky as birds, mountains swim in water as fish, animals speak as humans and stars grow like plants. Spatial order and temporal sequence do not restrict the narrative. This is not to say that tribal creations have no conventions or rules, but simply that they admit the principle of association between emotion and the narrative motif. Thus stars, seas, mountains, trees, men and animals can be angry, sad or happy.

It might be said that tribal artists work more on the basis of their racial and sensory memory than on the basis of a cultivated imagination. In order to understand this distinction, we must understand the difference between imagination and memory. In the animate world, consciousness meets two immediate material realities: space and time. We put meaning into space by perceiving it in terms of images. The image-making faculty is a genetic gift to the human mind—this power of imagination helps us understand the space that envelops us. With regard to time, we make connections with the help of memory; one remembers being the same person today as one was yesterday.

The tribal mind has a more acute sense of time than the sense of space. Somewhere along the history of human civilization, tribal communities seem to have realized that domination over territorial space was not their lot. Thus, they seem to have turned almost obsessively to gaining domination over time. This urge is substantiated in their ritual of conversing with their dead ancestors: year after year, tribals in many parts of India worship terracotta or carved-wood objects representing their ancestors, aspiring to enter a trance in which they can converse with the dead. Over the centuries, an amazingly sharp memory has helped tribals classify material and natural objects into a highly complex system of knowledge. . . .

One of the main characteristics of the tribal arts is their distinct manner of constructing space and imagery, which might be described as ‘hallucinatory’. In both oral and visual forms of representation, tribal artists seem to interpret verbal or pictorial space as demarcated by an extremely flexible ‘frame’. The boundaries between art and non-art become almost invisible. A tribal epic can begin its narration from a trivial everyday event; tribal paintings merge with living space as if the two were one and the same. And within the narrative itself, or within the painted imagery, there is no deliberate attempt to follow a sequence. The episodes retold and the images created take on the apparently chaotic shapes of dreams. In a way, the syntax of language and the grammar of painting are the same, as if literature were painted words and painting were a song of images.

On the basis of the passage, which one of the following explains the main difference between imagination and memory?

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 3

The correct answer is option 3. In the second paragraph, the passage explicitly states that "we put meaning into space by perceiving it in terms of images" through the "image-making faculty," which is imagination, and that "with regard to time, we make connections with the help of memory." Option 3 directly captures this core distinction: imagination helps humans make sense of space, and memory helps them understand time. This is the passage's defining framework for differentiating the two faculties.

Option 1 is wrong (half right). The passage does mention "cultivated imagination" and "racial and sensory memory," but these phrases describe how tribal artists rely more on memory than on a cultivated imagination. They do not constitute the main definitional difference between the two faculties, which the passage anchors to space and time, not to whether one is intuitive and the other cultivated.

Option 2 is wrong (out of scope). While the passage notes that tribal groups have a more acute sense of time and rely on memory, this describes a tribal preference rather than the fundamental distinction between imagination and memory as cognitive faculties. The question asks about the main difference between the two, not about tribal artistic priorities.

Option 4 is wrong (keyword trap). The passage does call imagination "a genetic gift" and does mention consciousness meeting space and time, but it never claims memory is uniquely central to consciousness while imagination is not. Both faculties serve consciousness; the actual distinction the passage draws is their respective roles regarding space and time, not their relationship to consciousness or genetics.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question