Skip to main contentSkip to solution

The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.

Production and legitimation of scientific knowledge can be approached from a number of perspectives. To study knowledge production from the sociology of professions perspective would mean a focus on the institutionalization of a body of knowledge. The professions approach informed earlier research on managerial occupation, business schools and management knowledge. It however tends to reify institutional power structures in its understanding of the links between knowledge and authority. Knowledge production is restricted in the perspective to the selected members of the professional community, most notably to the university faculties and professional colleges. Power is understood as a negative mechanism, which prevents the non-professional actors from offering their ideas and information as legitimate knowledge.

Solution

βœ… Correct Option: 1

We need to find what the author is really saying about the professions approach to studying knowledge production.

The passage starts broad -> mentions multiple perspectives exist -> then zooms in on one specific approach (professions perspective) -> explains what it does -> then points out its major problem.

From passage: "To study knowledge production from the sociology of professions perspective would mean a focus on the institutionalization of a body of knowledge... It however tends to reify institutional power structures... Knowledge production is restricted in the perspective to the selected members of the professional community"

The author's logic: Professions approach = institutionalizes knowledge BUT restricts it to select few -> excludes non-professionals -> power becomes negative mechanism.


🟠 Option 2 -> scope-error -> only talks about creating institutions, completely ignores the restriction problem that the author spends half the passage criticizing. Missing the "but" part!

πŸ”΄ Option 3 -> too-broad -> this is just the opening line! Doesn't address the specific professions approach discussion that makes up 90% of the passage. Way too general.

🟠 Option 4 -> partial-truth -> mentions it's been used for management studies (true!) but misses both the institutionalization focus AND the restriction criticism. Only captures a small detail.

🟒 Option 1 -> captures the complete picture -> mentions both what the approach aims to do (institutionalize) AND its major flaw (restricts to select few). This matches the author's balanced critique perfectly.

The key insight: when a passage says "X does this... however it has this problem," your answer must include both parts!

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question