There is a sentence that is missing in the paragraph below. Look at the paragraph and decide where (option 1, 2, 3, or 4) the following sentence would best fit.
Paragraph: ___ (1) ___ An argument can be defined as a complex symbolic structure where some parts, known as the premises, offer support to another part, the conclusion. Alternatively, an argument can be viewed as a complex speech act consisting of one or more acts of premising (which assert propositions in favor of the conclusion), an act of concluding, and a stated or implicit marker ("hence", "therefore) that indicates that the conclusion follows from the premises ___ (2) ___ . The relation of support between premises and conclusion can be cashed out in different ways: the premises may guarantee the truth of the conclusion, or make Its truth more probable; the premises may imply the conclusion; the premises may make the conclusion more acceptable (or assertible) ___ (3) ___ . But depending on one's explanatory goals, there is also much to be gained from considering arguments as they in fact occur in human communicative practices ___ (4) ___ .
Sentence: For theoretical purposes, arguments may be considered as freestanding entities, abstracted from their contexts of use in actual human activities.
There is a sentence that is missing in the paragraph below. Look at the paragraph and decide where (option 1, 2, 3, or 4) the following sentence would best fit.
Paragraph: ___ (1) ___ An argument can be defined as a complex symbolic structure where some parts, known as the premises, offer support to another part, the conclusion. Alternatively, an argument can be viewed as a complex speech act consisting of one or more acts of premising (which assert propositions in favor of the conclusion), an act of concluding, and a stated or implicit marker ("hence", "therefore) that indicates that the conclusion follows from the premises ___ (2) ___ . The relation of support between premises and conclusion can be cashed out in different ways: the premises may guarantee the truth of the conclusion, or make Its truth more probable; the premises may imply the conclusion; the premises may make the conclusion more acceptable (or assertible) ___ (3) ___ . But depending on one's explanatory goals, there is also much to be gained from considering arguments as they in fact occur in human communicative practices ___ (4) ___ .
Sentence: For theoretical purposes, arguments may be considered as freestanding entities, abstracted from their contexts of use in actual human activities.
Solution
We need to find where the missing sentence fits best by understanding the flow of ideas. Let us trace the logical progression.
The paragraph starts with theoretical definitions -> then discusses how premises support conclusions -> then needs to transition to practical applications.
From passage: "But depending on one's explanatory goals, there is also much to be gained from considering arguments as they in fact occur in human communicative practices"
The missing sentence talks about arguments being "abstracted from their contexts" for theoretical purposes. This creates a perfect contrast with the final sentence about arguments in "actual human activities".
Think: Theoretical abstraction -> BUT -> Real-world practice
The sentence needs to go right before this contrast word "But" to set up the opposition between theory and practice.
π΄ Option 1 -> context-shift -> The paragraph starts by defining arguments. Adding theoretical abstraction here would be jumping ahead before we even understand what arguments are.
π΄ Option 2 -> scope-error -> This spot is still explaining the technical definition of speech acts and markers. The theoretical abstraction sentence would interrupt this explanation.
π’ Option 3 -> perfect transition -> After all theoretical explanations are done, this sentence sets up the contrast with "But" in the next part. Theory first -> then practical applications.
π΄ Option 4 -> placement-error -> This would come after the "But" which talks about real human practices. The sentence would contradict the flow by going backwards to theory.
The key is spotting that "But" word - it signals a contrast coming, so position 3 perfectly sets up that contrast.