Skip to main contentSkip to solution

A train travelled a certain distance at a uniform speed. Had the speed been 66 km per hour more, it would have needed 44 hours less. Had the speed been 66 km per hour less, it would have needed 66 hours more. The distance, in km, travelled by the train is

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 2

We know that Distance == Speed ×\times Time.

In our two scenarios, the distance always remains the same.

ScenarioSpeedTimeDistance
Original

ss

tt

stst

Case 1 (6km/hr faster, 4 hours less)

s+6s + 6

t−4t - 4

(s+6)(t−4)(s + 6)(t - 4)

Case 2 (6km/hr slower, 6 hours more)

s−6s - 6

t+6t + 6

(s−6)(t+6)(s - 6)(t + 6)


Since the distance is always the same. We can equate them:

Distance in Case 1 == Distance of Original Train

⇒(s+6)(t−4)=st\Rightarrow (s + 6)(t - 4) = st

⇒st−4s+6t−24=st\Rightarrow st - 4s + 6t - 24 = st

⇒−4s+6t−24=0\Rightarrow -4s + 6t - 24 = 0

⇒−4s+6t=24\Rightarrow -4s + 6t = 24 ... (equation i)


Distance in Case 2 == Distance of Original Train

⇒(s−6)(t+6)=st\Rightarrow (s - 6)(t + 6) = st

⇒st+6s−6t−36=st\Rightarrow st + 6s - 6t - 36 = st

⇒6s−6t−36=0\Rightarrow 6s - 6t - 36 = 0

⇒6s−6t=36\Rightarrow 6s - 6t = 36 ... (equation ii)


Solving equation (i) and equation (ii) by adding:

−4s+6t=24(+)6s−6t=362s=60s=30 km/hr\begin{aligned} -4s + 6t &= 24 \\ (+) \quad 6s - 6t &= 36 \\ \hline 2s &= 60 \\ s &= 30 \text{ km/hr} \end{aligned}


Substituting s=30s = 30 in equation (i):

−4s+6t=24−4(30)+6t=24−120+6t=246t=144t=24 hours\begin{aligned} -4s + 6t &= 24 \\ -4(30) + 6t &= 24 \\ -120 + 6t &= 24 \\ 6t &= 144 \\ t &= 24 \text{ hours} \end{aligned}


Original Distance =st=(30)(24)=720=st = (30)(24) = 720 kilometers.

In speed-time-distance problems where distance is constant, setting up equations using the fact that different speed-time combinations yield the same distance is the most efficient approach.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question