CATVA > MediumEntered answer:✅ Correct Answer: 4Related questions:CAT 2018 Slot 1Five jumbled up sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), related to a topic, are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a coherent paragraph. Identify the odd sentence and key in the number of that sentence as your answer. Translators are like bumblebees. Though long since scientifically disproved, this factoid is still routinely trotted out. Similar pronouncements about the impossibility of translation have dogged practitioners since Leonardo Bruni’s De interpretatione recta, published in 1424. Bees, unaware of these deliberations, have continued to flit from flower to flower, and translators continue to translate. In 1934, the French entomologist August Magnan pronounced the flight of the bumblebee to be aerodynamically impossible CAT 2024 Slot 2Five jumbled up sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), related to a topic, are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a coherent paragraph. Identify the odd sentence and key in the number of that sentence as your answer. No known real researcher of human behaviour would say that gender is all nature or all nurture. The evidence for a biological basis for gender certainly doesn't mean we should be complacent in the face of sexism. Many people are uncomfortable with the Idea that gender Is not purely a social construct. Despite this empirical truth, researchers who study the biological basis of gender often face political pushback. There's a political preference for gender to be only a reflection of social factors and so entirely malleable. CAT 2024 Slot 3Five jumbled up sentences (labelled 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), related to a topic, are given below. Four of them can be put together to form a coherent paragraph. Identify the odd sentence and key in the number of that sentence as your answer. Part of the appeal of forecasting is not just that it seems to work, but that you don't seem to need specialized expertise to succeed at it. The tight connection between forecasting and building a model of the world helps explain why so much of the early interest in the idea came from the intelligence community. This was true even though the latter had access to classified intelligence. One frequently cited study found that accurate forecasters' predictions of geopolitical events, when aggregated using standard scientific methods, were more accurate than the forecasts of members of the US intelligence community who answered the same questions in a confidential prediction market. The aggregated opinions of non-experts doing forecasting have proven to be a better guide to the future than the aggregated opinions of experts.