Skip to main contentSkip to solution

Moutai has been the global booze sensation of the decade. A bottle of its Flying Fairy which sold in the 1980s for the equivalent of a dollar now retails for $400. Moutai's listed shares have soared by almost 600% in the past five years, outpacing the likes of Amazon.

It does this while disregarding every Western marketing mantra. It is not global, has meagre digital sales and does not appeal to millennials. It scores pitifully on environmental, social and governance measures. In the Boy Scout world of Western business it would leave a bad taste, in more ways than one.

Moutai owes its intoxicating success to three factors-not all of them easy to emulate. First, it profits from Chinese nationalism. Moutai is known as the "national liquor". It was used to raise spirits and disinfect wounds in Mao's Long March. It was Premier Zhou Enlai's favourite tipple, shared with Richard Nixon in 1972. Its centuries-old craftsmanship-it is distilled eight times and stored for years in earthenware jars-is a source of national pride. It also claims to be hangover-proof, which would make it an invention to rival gunpowder.

Second, it chose to serve China's super-rich rather than its middle class. Markets are littered with the corpses of firms that could not compete in the cut-throat battle for Chinese middle-class wallets. And the country's premium market is massive-at 73 m73 \mathrm{~m}-strong, bigger than the population of France, notes Euan McLeish of Bernstein, an investment firm, and still less crowded with prestige brands than advanced economies. Moutai is to these well-heeled drinkers what vintage champagne is to the rest of the world.

Third, Moutai looks beyond affluent millennials and digital natives. The elderly and the middle-aged, it found, can be just as lucrative. Its biggest market now is (male) drinkers in their mid-30s. Many have no siblings, thanks to four decades of China's one-child policy-which also means their elderly parents can splash out on weddings and banquets. Moutai is often a guest of honour.

Moutai has succeeded thanks to nationalism, elitism and ageism, in other words-not in spite of this unholy trinity. But it faces risks. The government is its largest shareholder-and a meddlesome one. It appears to want prices to remain stable. Exorbitantly priced booze is at odds with its professed socialist ideals. Yet minority investors-including many foreign funds-lament that Moutai's wholesale price is a third of what it sells for in shops. Raising it could boost the company's profits further. Instead, in what some see as a travesty of corporate governance, its majority owner has plans to set up its own sales channel.

In the long run, its biggest risk may be millennials. As they grow older, health concerns, work-life balance and the desire for more wholesome pursuits than binge-drinking may curb the "Ganbei!" toasting culture [heavy drinkingl on which so much of the demand for Moutai rests. For the time being, though, the party goes on.

The phrase “would make it an invention to rival gunpowder” has been used in the passage in a sense that is

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 1

From passage: "It also claims to be hangover-proof, which would make it an invention to rival gunpowder."

The author isn't saying Moutai IS like gunpowder as a substance -> instead, he's saying a hangover-proof drink would be so revolutionary that its impact could match gunpowder's impact on history -> this is a figure of speech to show how amazing such an invention would be.


Elimination Strategy:

Students often get confused between "literal" and "metaphorical" here. Think: Is the author actually comparing the physical properties of alcohol and gunpowder? Or is he comparing their revolutionary impact?

🟢 Option 1: metaphorical -> correct -> The comparison focuses on revolutionary impact, not actual substance. Gunpowder changed warfare; hangover-proof alcohol would change drinking culture.

🔴 Option 2: literal -> wrong -> The author isn't saying Moutai literally resembles gunpowder in composition or function. They're completely different substances.

🔴 Option 3: substantive -> scope-error -> While discussing Moutai's substance, the comparison itself isn't about comparing the actual substances but their historical significance.

🔴 Option 4: synonymical -> meaning-error -> Moutai and gunpowder don't mean the same thing at all. One is alcohol, one is explosive powder.

The phrase uses gunpowder as a benchmark for revolutionary inventions, not as a literal comparison of materials.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question