We need to find what the different reactions to Chinese vs Israeli lunar activities tell us. Let us trace through the key comparison in the passage. From passage: "China recently sent a terrarium to the moon and germinated a plant seed—with, unsurprisingly, no protest from its own scientific community. In contrast, when it was recently revealed that a researcher had surreptitiously smuggled super-resilient microscopic tardigrades aboard the ill-fated Israeli Beresheet lunar probe, a firestorm was unleashed within the space community." The author sets up a clear contrast -> China's action gets no protest from Chinese scientists -> Israel's action creates a firestorm in the space community. This shows different groups react differently to similar contamination issues.

Eliminating: 🔴 Option 1 -> scope-error -> focuses on which contamination is worse (animal vs plant) but passage doesn't compare contamination severity - it compares reactions to contamination 🔴 Option 2 -> overstates -> claims "global biases towards countries" but passage shows Chinese scientists didn't protest their own country's action while space community protested Israel's - this is about different sensitivities, not country bias 🔴 Option 4 -> degree-error -> calls China's approach "reasonable" but passage doesn't judge which approach is better - just shows they're different 🟢 Option 3 is correct -> captures the core point that different national scientific communities show different levels of sensitivity to contamination issues (Chinese scientists = no protest, space community = firestorm) The key insight -> same type of issue (lunar contamination) gets completely different reactions from different scientific groups, showing they have different sensitivities to biosphere protection concerns.

CAT (VARC) PYQs

Keyboard Shortcuts