Solution
We need to find why the author calls Moutai's strategy an "unholy trinity"
The passage sets up a clear contrast early on. Moutai succeeds "while disregarding every Western marketing mantra" - no global reach, poor digital sales, doesn't appeal to millennials, terrible on environmental/social measures.
From passage: "In the Boy Scout world of Western business it would leave a bad taste, in more ways than one."
Then the author explains Moutai's three success factors -> nationalism + elitism + ageism. Right after listing these, the author says: "Moutai has succeeded thanks to nationalism, elitism and ageism, in other words-not in spite of this unholy trinity."
The word "unholy" suggests something that goes against accepted standards or norms. The passage repeatedly contrasts Moutai with Western business practices -> this is the key context for understanding "unholy."
๐ Option 1 -> partial-truth -> Only mentions nationalism (one piece) but ignores that "unholy trinity" refers to all three factors combined going against Western norms
๐ Option 2 -> context-shift -> The passage mentions risks later, but "unholy trinity" appears before the risks section. Author isn't calling it unholy because of future risks.
๐ข Option 3 -> correct -> Captures the core contrast. Author calls it "unholy" because these three strategies (nationalism + elitism + ageism) go against what Western marketing considers proper business practice
๐ด Option 4 -> irrelevant -> Makes a moral judgment about liquor marketing that the author never makes. The passage is about business strategy differences, not moral judgments about alcohol.
The "unholy" label comes from the sharp contrast with Western business mantras, not from any single factor or moral stance.