Skip to main contentSkip to solution

This book takes the position that setting in literature is more than just backdrop, that important insight into literary texts can be made by paying close attention to how authors craft place, as well as to how place functions in a narrative. The authors included in this reference work engage deeply with either real or imagined geographies. They care about how human decisions have shaped landscapes and how landscapes have shaped human practices and values. Some of the best writing is highly vivid, employing the language of the senses because this is the primary means through which humans know physical space.

Literature can offer valuable perspectives on physical and cultural geography. Unlike scientific reports, a literary narrative can provide the emotional component missing from the scientific record. In human experience, geographical places have a spiritual or emotional component in addition to and as part of a physical layout and topography. This emotional component, although subjective, is no less "real" than a surveyor's map. Human consciousness of place is experienced in a multi-modal manner. Histories of places live on in many forms, one of which is the human memory or imagination.

Both real and imaginary landscapes provide insight into the human experience of place. The pursuit of such a topic speaks to the valuable knowledge produced from bridging disciplines and combining material from both the arts and the sciences to better understand the human condition. The perspectives that most concern cultural geographers are often those regarding movement and migration, cultivation of natural resources, and organization of space. The latter two reflect concerns of the built environment, a topic shared with the field of architectural study. Many of these concerns are also reflected in work sociologists do. Scholars from literary studies can contribute an aesthetic dimension to what might otherwise be a purely ideological approach.

Literature can bring together material that spans different branches of science. For example, a literary description of place may involve not only the environment and geography but the noises and quality of light, or how people from different races or classes can experience the same place in different ways linked to those racial or class disparities. Literary texts can also account for the way in which absence-of other people, animals, and so on-affects a human observer or inhabitant. Both literary and scientific approaches to place are necessary, working in unison, to achieve a complete record of an environment. It is important to note that the interdisciplinary nature of this work teaches us that landscapes are not static, that they are not unchanged by human culture. At least part of their identity derives from the people who inhabit them and from the way space can alter and inspire human perspective. The intersection of scientific and literary expression that happens in the study of literary geography is of prime importance due to the complexity of the personal and political ways that humans experience place.

All of the following statements, if false, would contradict the arguments in the passage, EXCEPT that:

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 4

The correct answer is option 4. The question asks which statement, if false, would NOT contradict the passage. A statement whose falsity would not contradict the passage is one that already contradicts it; making it false would actually align with the passage. Option 4 claims humans do not interact with places in subjective, emotional ways because places are only physical topography. This directly opposes the second paragraph, which states that geographical places have "a spiritual or emotional component" and that this subjective dimension is no less real than a surveyor's map. Since option 4 already contradicts the passage, its being false would confirm the passage rather than contradict it, making it the correct EXCEPT choice.

Option 1 is wrong as a choice for EXCEPT (it matches the passage). The first paragraph explicitly links "highly vivid" writing and "the language of the senses" to how humans know physical space, while the second paragraph describes consciousness of place as "multi-modal." If this claim were false, it would contradict those points.

Option 2 is wrong as a choice for EXCEPT (it matches the passage). The second paragraph argues that the emotional component of place is no less real than a surveyor's map, implying that written or narrative descriptions can convey a real sense of place without requiring visual scientific aids. Falsifying this would oppose the passage's stance.

Option 3 is wrong as a choice for EXCEPT (it matches the passage). The third paragraph identifies "movement and migration" among the perspectives that concern cultural geographers, and the passage throughout argues literature yields valuable insight into such geographical concerns. Denying this would contradict the passage's argument.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question