Solution
The correct answer is option 1. Riddle explains that the "apparent inefficiency" of starting to make an eye and then destroying it is unavoidable because "the early development of the brain and the eye are completely intertwined -- they happen together." This means that cavefish embryos must begin eye formation just as surface fish do, since halting it earlier would disrupt brain development. Option 1 directly reflects this reasoning: cavefish resemble non-cave-dwelling variants in their early developmental stages, which is precisely why the eye-building process cannot simply be skipped from the outset.
Option 2 is wrong (out of scope). The scarcity and inconsistency of food in caves is discussed elsewhere in the passage in connection with fat storage and nutrient absorption, but it has nothing to do with why embryonic eye development must begin before being halted. This conflates two separate topics.
Option 3 is wrong (keyword trap). The passage does mention sensory enhancements such as additional tastebuds, but these compensatory gains are discussed as separate evolutionary outcomes, not as the reason the developmental inefficiency is unavoidable. The question asks specifically about the embryological constraint Riddle identifies.
Option 4 is wrong (reversed). The passage states that cells in the developing eye "start dying" as a genetically programmed process of natural selection, not that the absence of light in caves directly kills the eye cells. This option misidentifies the cause by attributing it to an environmental trigger rather than to the developmental entanglement of brain and eye formation.