Skip to main contentSkip to solution

This book takes the position that setting in literature is more than just backdrop, that important insight into literary texts can be made by paying close attention to how authors craft place, as well as to how place functions in a narrative. The authors included in this reference work engage deeply with either real or imagined geographies. They care about how human decisions have shaped landscapes and how landscapes have shaped human practices and values. Some of the best writing is highly vivid, employing the language of the senses because this is the primary means through which humans know physical space.

Literature can offer valuable perspectives on physical and cultural geography. Unlike scientific reports, a literary narrative can provide the emotional component missing from the scientific record. In human experience, geographical places have a spiritual or emotional component in addition to and as part of a physical layout and topography. This emotional component, although subjective, is no less "real" than a surveyor's map. Human consciousness of place is experienced in a multi-modal manner. Histories of places live on in many forms, one of which is the human memory or imagination.

Both real and imaginary landscapes provide insight into the human experience of place. The pursuit of such a topic speaks to the valuable knowledge produced from bridging disciplines and combining material from both the arts and the sciences to better understand the human condition. The perspectives that most concern cultural geographers are often those regarding movement and migration, cultivation of natural resources, and organization of space. The latter two reflect concerns of the built environment, a topic shared with the field of architectural study. Many of these concerns are also reflected in work sociologists do. Scholars from literary studies can contribute an aesthetic dimension to what might otherwise be a purely ideological approach.

Literature can bring together material that spans different branches of science. For example, a literary description of place may involve not only the environment and geography but the noises and quality of light, or how people from different races or classes can experience the same place in different ways linked to those racial or class disparities. Literary texts can also account for the way in which absence-of other people, animals, and so on-affects a human observer or inhabitant. Both literary and scientific approaches to place are necessary, working in unison, to achieve a complete record of an environment. It is important to note that the interdisciplinary nature of this work teaches us that landscapes are not static, that they are not unchanged by human culture. At least part of their identity derives from the people who inhabit them and from the way space can alter and inspire human perspective. The intersection of scientific and literary expression that happens in the study of literary geography is of prime importance due to the complexity of the personal and political ways that humans experience place.

The author uses the example of the literary description of place to illustrate that:

Solution

✅ Correct Option: 1

The correct answer is option 1. In paragraph 4, the author introduces the example of a literary description of place specifically to show that literature can capture "how people from different races or classes can experience the same place in different ways linked to those racial or class disparities." Option 1 directly paraphrases this point, making it the best answer for what the example is meant to illustrate.

Option 2 is wrong (half right). The passage does mention that literary texts can account for how absence of other people or animals affects an observer, but this is raised as a separate capability of literature, not as the central point the example of literary description of place is used to illustrate. The example's primary thrust is about diverse human experiences of the same location.

Option 3 is wrong (reversed). The passage argues the opposite: literary and scientific approaches are both necessary and complementary. It never claims scientific approaches are more accurate; in fact, it highlights what science lacks, namely the emotional and subjective dimensions that literature provides.

Option 4 is wrong (out of scope). The passage never discusses architects calibrating noises and lights. While paragraph 3 briefly mentions the built environment as a topic shared with architectural study, the example in paragraph 4 about noises and quality of light pertains to literary description, not to any architectural method.

Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Left arrow: Previous question
  • Right arrow: Next question
  • S key: Jump to solution
  • Q key: Jump to question