Solution
Need to find what the author argues, then see which option supports or stays neutral.
From passage: "Research has consistently held that people who are presented with a few options make better, easier decisions than those presented with many"
Author's main claims -> Choice anxiety is real -> Fewer options = better decisions -> Companies like Casper succeed by offering limited choices -> Even these companies eventually expand due to investor pressure
Elimination Process:
š“ Option 1 -> contradicts core claim -> Says more options = more empowerment, but passage clearly states fewer options = better decisions
š“ Option 3 -> contradicts influencer claim -> Author says people gravitate toward lifestyle influencers because of choice fatigue, but this shows companies using influencers perform worse
š“ Option 4 -> contradicts inequality claim -> Author says more options help rich while hurting poor, but this suggests more options help poor through lower prices
š¢ Option 2 -> actually supports author -> Companies with fewer options doing better aligns perfectly with author's argument that limited choices work better
The confusion here: Students might think Option 2 contradicts something because it compares "fewer options" vs "curated products." But look closer -> both are actually strategies the author mentions as responses to choice anxiety. The author talks about companies offering "freedom from choice" and "curation" as solutions.
Option 2 saying fewer-option companies outperform curated-option companies doesn't weaken anything -> it just shows one solution works better than another, which supports the main point that limiting choices helps consumers.