We need to find what does **NOT** support the passage's main claim about Aladdin's authorship. Step 1: Identify the passage's main claim about authorship -> Aladdin was likely based on Diyab's real experiences, not French sources Step 2: Find evidence that supports vs. challenges this claim From passage: "For 300 years, scholars thought that the rags-to-riches story of Aladdin might have been inspired by the plots of French fairy tales... The idea that Diyab might have based it on his own life... flips the script." The author is challenging the old French fairy tale theory -> wants to prove Diyab was the real inspiration instead.

Elimination Process: 🔴 Option 1 -> **goes-against-claim** -> This is the old theory the passage tries to disprove. French fairy tales don't support the claim that Diyab authored it - they compete with it! 🟢 Option 2 -> **supports-claim** -> Passage says "Diyab's memoir reveals a narrator adept at capturing the distinctive psychology of a young protagonist" - shows he had the skills 🟢 Option 3 -> **supports-claim** -> "descriptions he uses were very similar to the descriptions of the lavish palace that ended up in Galland's version" - direct evidence linking Diyab's experience to the story 🟢 Option 4 -> **supports-claim** -> "Galland wrote in his diary that he first heard the tale from a Syrian storyteller... named Hanna Diyab" - proves Diyab was the source Key insight: Options 2, 3, and 4 all provide evidence for Diyab being the real author. Option 1 represents the competing theory that the passage argues against. **Answer: Option 1**

CAT (VARC) PYQs

Keyboard Shortcuts