We need to find which option does NOT serve as evidence that Aladdin's character is based on Diyab himself. Let us trace through the passage to see what evidence scholars use. From passage: "Despite the fantastical elements of the story, scholars now think the main character may actually be based on a real person's real experiences." The key insight -> scholars believe Aladdin's character traits mirror Diyab's life experiences, not just that Diyab told the story. From passage: "The descriptions he uses were very similar to the descriptions of the lavish palace that ended up in Galland's version of the Aladdin story." This shows the connection -> Diyab's personal experiences at Versailles influenced the story details.

🟢 Option 1 -> correct answer -> Just telling a story doesn't prove the character is based on you. Diyab could have told a completely fictional tale or a story about someone else entirely. This is just the source of the story, not evidence the character reflects Diyab. 🔴 Option 2 -> strong evidence -> The passage says "Diyab was ideally placed to embody the overlapping world of East and West" - this cross-cultural experience directly parallels Aladdin's story. 🔴 Option 3 -> strong evidence -> The passage explicitly connects Diyab's descriptions of Versailles wealth to "the lavish palace that ended up in Galland's version" - direct character influence. 🔴 Option 4 -> strong evidence -> The passage mentions Diyab's "hard-knocks upbringing" and shows this matches the "rags-to-riches story of Aladdin" - clear character parallel. The confusion students might have -> thinking that because Diyab told the story, that automatically means it's about him. But telling a story ≠ being the inspiration for the character.

CAT (VARC) PYQs

Keyboard Shortcuts